February 2012
84 posts
All of my teachers think we are in the fucking 7th and 8th weeks of school so they expect us to have read more than we were supposed to.
Travis Bartosek signed up for The League at Sports Authority tonight. Thanks to him, that’s 25 cents for me.
The only thing I ever think about anymore is school and transferring to UCSD in a couple semesters. Oh, and my new car.
Am I the only one who actually likes David Hume?
What's Up With "Alot" and "A Lot"?
theyuniversity:
If you’re wondering where the “Alot” creature comes from, click HERE.
Maybe If prison wasn’t such a happy place, then people would stop going.
– Stupid conservative kid in CA politics
Rocked Foxy Shazam’s The Church of Rock & Roll on the way to school in my new car. The sound is pretty sick
My parents are going to try to get some sick deals on cars for me while I’m at work. Let’s pray we can get that Scion xB.
I love how they play the theme music from Flight of the Conchords on Capital Public Radio
Capitalism, the infernal machine
Aaron Leonard: You write, "Capital is not a book about politics, and not even a book about labour: it is a book about unemployment." Could you talk about why you think that is true?
Frederic Jameson: I know this is probably surprising for people who always think of Marx in political terms, but there is really very little mention of any political action in Capital. There is certainly the implication of the kind of society that could come out of capitalism and also of the contradictions that could lead to the end of capitalism and I am not saying that Marx was not political or didn't constantly think of political strategies, but Capital is not a book about that. It is a book about this infernal machine that is capitalism.
It is a book about unemployment in the sense that the absolute general law of capitalism, as he enunciates it, is to increase productivity -- as a result, as he writes, "The relative mass of the industrial reserve army [the unemployed] increases therefore with the potential energy of wealth." I think this corresponds very much to what is happening in the present. I heard the most revealing thing recently from a venture capitalist, obviously annoyed by the constant talk of both Republicans and Democrats about supporting business so it can ‘create jobs.'
He said look, "Nobody wakes up in the morning and says, I wanted to increase my payroll because I think it's good for the American economy." This is a pretty direct way of saying business does not exist to create jobs; it is there to make money. That is exactly what Marx lays out in Capital. There is no direct connection between productivity and creating jobs.
This was not so clear as long as Keynesian economics were being applied in certain countries -- Keynes understood there had to be workers with enough money to buy all these goods being produced. Since Reagan and Thatcher, however, we get something more like the fundamental logic of capital Marx described. It is not just job flight to other countries; this is part of a worldwide process.
You want to bring factories back to the United States but on the other hand you want them to be productive? Well that means more and more automation and less and less workers, it is obvious. So I think there really is a profound contradiction between employment and what the system does. In that sense it seems to me, a political demand of the kind that there used for full employment is a demand for something the system can't possibly provide.
Finally done with that god damn constitution
Obligatory post
for how I give no fucks about Valentine’s day because I don’t have a girlfriend.
Grammar is the difference between knowing your shit and knowing you’re shit.
– My flammable roommate’s fabulous writing professor (via commodore-sparklebutt
)
xybutt:
Roses are red
Violets are red
Everything is red
Fuck my life
Marx last class and Skinner this class? Fuck yeah
Shit, I have an 8 hour shift today.
That’s why there’s always mice on my cocks… Three blind mice...